| Thursday, June 2, 2005
Cooks spoil simple broth of 'Hens'
Review: David Harrower's play has a uncomplicated message, but it's obscured
by his approach and Rude Guerrilla's staging.
By ERIC MARCHESE
Special To The Register
With "Knives in Hens," Scottish playwright David Harrower has written a
simple tale about a plowman, his wife and a miller - perhaps too simple for
most theater companies to pull off with success, or for their audiences to
grasp.
Rude Guerrilla Theater Company's staging of the 1995 play at the Empire
Theater in Santa Ana shows just how thoroughly confusing "Knives" can be
when not properly cast and performed.
The framework of Harrower's play is, well ... simple: In an unspecified
rural community, a crude plowman named William has just wed a young woman as
much for her abilities as a field hand as anything. They're simple folk
whose lives consist of plowing and working the land, eating, sleeping and
having sex.
What becomes clear early on in Scott Barber's staging is that William, like
everyone else in his small village, despises the local miller, and he
intends to inculcate that same hatred in his ignorant new wife. At the same
time, William clearly prefers to keep his wife in the dark about certain
things.
The miller, whose name is Gilbert Horn, is relatively well-educated in
comparison with the villagers. That fact, Harrower slowly reveals, is the
true source of their loathing of him - something we learn only by watching
the effect his presence has upon William's young marriage.
In terms of allegory, "Knives in Hens" has the potential for genuine
potency, a tale that glorifies literacy and open-mindedness over ignorance
and superstition. Harrower, however, has crafted something too slow-moving
and too cryptic to engage your mind or grip your heart; compounding the
problem at Rude Guerrilla is Barber's miscasting of all three roles.
The plowman is a grimy primitive with primal needs, an animalistic nature
and the sort of cunning that would make him instinctively self-protective,
even while he's bullying his wife or facing off with the miller. As William,
though, Vince Campbell reads his lines as if weary and bored, not edgy and
dangerous.
Aurelio Locsin's Gilbert is just as uninspired, the actor equating flat line
readings with rustication. Worse still, Locsin's intelligence shines through
as slyness, a quality that seems to justify the villagers' suspicions of
him. Judging from the script, the miller is soft-spoken, scholarly and
philosophical qualities Locsin fails to evoke.
As the Young Woman (unnamed in the script), Christine Tanabe struggles with
the scenes where Harrower wants us to see the character struggling to make
sense of her place in the universe. The combination of Harrower's dialogue
and Tanabe's limited acting range makes it appear that the Young Woman is
wrestling not with metaphysical concepts, but with the English language
itself.
Barber's set is pleasantly minimalist, and his sound design effectively uses
guitar music suggestive of rural England. Harrower's script, though, is
tricky. His characters - even the miller - are crude, a quality that most of
today's computer-using, cell-phone-toting thespians might find too
challenging to convincingly portray.
|