|
Wednesday, May 3, 2006
Theater: Beckett's bleak world in 'Endgame'
Review: Rude Guerrilla encapsulates the absurdist playwright's concepts of comedic yet brutal minimalist theater.
By ERIC MARCHESE
Special to the Register
Had Samuel Beckett written only "Waiting for Godot" and "Endgame," he would still have been hailed as the great visionary of the theater of the absurd.
From 1952, "Godot" gets universal acclaim and widespread stagings, but "Endgame," from five years later, deals with themes the prolific playwright explored in numerous other plays - confinement, helplessness, the tyranny of relationships.
Scheduled to coincide with the centenary of Beckett's birth, Rude Guerrilla Theater Company's staging of "Endgame" not only resounds with these quintessential Beckett concerns, but reverberates with elements from "Godot."
In an underground locale - it could be a basement, a bunker or a bomb shelter - four characters live out the ends of their lives. The forceful Hamm (Arturo Jones), who cannot walk, seems to be the master, and Clov (Allen Moon), who cannot sit, his servant.
The duo echo the brutality of the master-servant pair Pozzo and Lucky of "Godot," while their dialogue interchanges ring of that play's tramps, Didi and Gogo. Beckett, however, imbues Clov with a sense of how much Hamm needs him, giving him power over Hamm.
Confined in the same claustrophobic space are Hamm's parents, Nagg (Joseph Byrd) and Nell (Jami Lieberman). They're legless, and each lives in a garbage can, where they're treated more or less as pets - or worse, slaves.
This could be some bizarre, post-nuclear world where everyone struggles for survival, or it could simply be the extreme result of societies that value ideologies or materialism over human life. The time, place and context are never specified because, as director Michael David Fox's staging proves, Beckett's ideas transcend such specifics, creating disturbing images while raising philosophical questions deeply troubling once dwelled upon.
Beckett means for us to dwell on these issues, and Fox and company oblige with a compact staging that, like "Godot," can be achingly funny one moment, stark and bleak the next.
The laughter comes almost solely from Moon's work as Clov. A running gag has Clov repeatedly carting a stepladder on and off stage, going through an identical series of moves to set up the ladder, scale it, move the shredded curtains aside and peer out the windows before reversing the process.
With a background in dance, Moon lends a physical grace to these slapstick scenes that belies his characterization of Clov as a sinister type (think hunchback or pirate) with hissing voice and lurching walk. Clov takes perverse delight in Hamm's suffering, Moon and Fox taking care to show us Clov's sadism, bitterness and driving need to abandon Hamm once and for all.
Jones counters with an intense Hamm - a bellowing dictator with a fierce disposition. Like Clov, though, the man is a study in contradictions - pushy, yet in need of painkillers; arrogant, yet with a mien of sagacity. More crucially, while Moon's portrayal is visual, Jones' is aural, his spellbinding voice gripping the ear and the imagination.
Byrd and Lieberman's roles are smaller and less pivotal, but the pair respond in kind to the work of Jones and Moon. Byrd in particular neatly articulates Nagg's contempt for his son's arrogance.
The show's scenic, lighting and production design, by Shannon Lee Blas and Steven E. Parker Jr., are suitably stark and minimalist. Like Fox's direction, they force us to examine the ideas put forth by one of the 20th century's most innovative and influential playwrights.
|